CPACC

CPACC practice questions, page 4 of 8, with answer review and explanations.

Question 16

According to the Principles of Universal Design Version 2.0, an example of principle two: Flexibility in Use is

  1. accommodating a wide range of literacy and language skills.
  2. accommodating left- and right-handed access.
  3. providing compatibility with a variety of devices used by people with sensory limitations.
  4. using different modes (pictorial, verbal, tactile) for redundant presentation of essential information.

Question 17

Which example fully demonstrates Principles of Universal Design Version 2.0?

  1. Design policies that are geared specifically to persons with different disabilities.
  2. Make available segregated seating area for persons with disabilities.
  3. Provide identical means of use for all users where possible, equivalent when not.
  4. Provide a series of alternate options for different types of users.

Question 18

Images and icons that can explain content, navigational elements that are clear and large enough to touch, integrated speech output, and total keyboard accessibility that can be translated to switch access are ALL design practices that can facilitate the use of which type of assistive devices?

  1. Augmentative and alternative communication devices
  2. Listening devices
  3. Magnification devices
  4. Screen readers

Question 19

What are standard communication methods for a person who is Deafblind?

  1. Navigation aids, tactile sign language, Braille, tactile marking/sign
  2. Simplified environmental design, visual and audio alternatives to text
  3. Standard/consistent physical positioning and visual presentation, visual filters
  4. Visual labels/notifications/alerts, assistive listening devices, voice carryover

Question 20

In the Principles of Universal Design Version 2.0, which definition defines principle one: Equitable Use?

  1. design accommodates a wide range of individual preferences.
  2. design communicates necessary information effectively to the user regardless of sensory abilities.
  3. design is useful and marketable to people with diverse abilities.
  4. of the design is easy to understand, regardless of the user’s experience.