CCAR-P Practice Test practice questions, page 6 of 6, with answer review and explanations.
Question 26
The engineering lead at Trenova Systems, Inc. is evaluating two proposals for improving developer workflows using Claude-assisted tooling Proposal A adds Claude Code to the IDE for inline code generation and review. Proposal B routes all code-generation requests through a shared Slack bot with no IDE integration. Which two observations most accurately evaluate these proposals against workflow-improvement objectives? (Choose two.)
Proposal B is superior because centralizing requests in Slack creates an auditable log of all code-generation activity.
Proposal B introduces workflow friction by requiring developers to leave the IDE, which undermines the productivity objective.
Proposal A reduces context-switching by surfacing AI assistance at the point of development without requiring a separate tool.
Proposal B improves workflow velocity because Slack notifications create an asynchronous review queue.
Both proposals are equivalent because the underlying model capabilities are identical regardless of integration point.
Question 27
You are integrating Claude Code into a team workflow and must complete the design and configuration steps before piloting the integrated workflow. Which two steps must be completed BEFORE piloting the integrated workflow with a small group? (Choose two.) Each correct answer presents part of the solution.
Iterate the integrated workflow based on pilot findings before broader rollout to the team.
Document the integrated workflow with hand-off criteria, permission boundaries, and on-call runbooks.
Negotiate the workflow change with affected teams and obtain formal sign-off from each manager.
Identify the workflow steps where AI-assisted tooling adds value and where human authority must remain.
Configure the project-scope Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, permissions, subagents, and persistent project context.
Question 28
Engineering leadership wants to roll out Claude Skills to 280 developers across 14 teams. Skills will encode internal coding standards, code review checklists, and incident postmortem templates. Leadership has asked how to govern Skill authorship so that Skills remain trustworthy without bottlenecking on a single central team. Which governance model should you recommend?
centralized authorship by a single platform team responsible for every Skill produced
fully decentralized authorship across the 14 teams with no review before publication
federated authorship across the 14 teams with a central review and publish gate
per-developer authorship across the 280 engineers with no team-level coordination required
Question 29
You are compiling guardrail tactics for a customer-facing assistant. Which two tactics belong on the guardrail list? (Choose two.) Each correct answer presents a complete solution.
Embed approved override phrases that let trusted users relax guardrails on demand.
Layer prompt-level guardrails with runtime content checks rather than relying on either alone.
Validate the model output against a structured schema before downstream actions are taken.
Lower sampling temperature globally to reduce the chance of off-policy completions.
Rely on a single hardened system prompt that enumerates every disallowed behavior.